Showing posts with label 35mm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 35mm. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

My Final (Film) Photographs from Korea

In just 13 short days, I'll be getting on a plane. That plane will taxi down the runway and lift off. Hopefully, I'll have a window seat, so I can look down and marvel at this beautiful country one last time. And I'll recount the memories of the last 3 years, so many good memories.

Part of my preparation for that day was taking my last 3 rolls of film to Wolpo (World Photography), the photo processing lab I've used exclusively since I started shooting film. Although I dropped off these last rolls a couple weeks ago, I only found time to stop by and pick them up the other day, and even then, I didn't have any spare time for a teary-eyed goodbye with the shop owners, who, even though we don't speak the same language, I have gotten to know on at least a friendly level.

I had a bit of anxiety during the days and weeks I waited to finally get a look at these rolls of film for a couple reasons. The first reason having to do with my Leica M3 and my relative dissatisfaction with the results of all previous rolls. All of my previous shots with my Leica M3 came out really grainy and/or noisy. Granted, I hadn't shot with too many different types of film, in fact, I have loaded my M3 with black and white Ilford HP 400 film almost exclusively. So, for my final roll, I wanted to see how something like Portra 400 would look and if it would still result in grainy or noisy photos. I was pleased to see, that it did not. I think the grain and noise can be attributed to the scans themselves. I will have to get a few of those black and whites printed and see if they are just as grainy. In any event, the images from my final roll of film with my beautiful M3 turned out quite nice.

Onto the second roll which was shot with my trusty Leica M6. I've never had any issues with scans from my M6, nothing but good stuff. For a few seconds, the other day, I suffered from a case of temporary insanity and thought briefly about selling my Leica M3, but I regained my senses and snuffed out that thought. However, the fact still remains, that I get better images, more consistently, with my Leica M6, which makes owning the M3 a mere luxury.

So what about the third roll of film? Unfortunately, while my photo lab was able to process my third roll of film, they did not have the ability to scan it for me. The third roll of film was 35mm film, loaded into my Mamiya 7, medium format camera, via a 35mm panoramic adapter, resulting in an ultra wide 24mm x 65mm negative image. From what I see in the negatives, the images look good, however, you will have to revisit my blog to see the results, since I won't be able to get them scanned until sometime after I get settled in El Paso.

With that let's get on to the photos from my Leica M3 and M6, my final film images from Korea (not including the panoramic images I just mentioned). Both sets shot with the Zeiss Planar 50mm f/2 lens.

The photos below were shot over a two day stretch, about a week apart, in various parts of Seoul.

Leica M3


Seoul Subway


Bukchon Hanok Village




Changdeokgung Palace, Seoul



Near Anguk Station


Anguk Station


Leica M6


Nowon-gu, South Korea



Guitar Cafe, Chungmuro


Where's Waldo? Cheonggyecheon Stream


Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Another Camera Heads to the Shop

One of the pitfalls of buying vintage cameras on eBay is the likelihood that, although the listing states the camera is in working condition, a measurable percentage of the time, the camera is NOT in working condition. Of course, eBay offers buyer protection and I also have the option of sending the item back and requesting a refund. However, my camera repair guy here in Seoul is SO good, and SO affordable, that I usually just take the cameras to him for repair.

There's no way of knowing whether or not a particular camera is in good working order or not unless I put a roll of film through it. This Olympus 35 RD caught my eye on eBay recently, the price was right and I seemed to have grown quite fond of range finder film cameras. However, as you can see by the sample images from my first roll of film, it has a few issues. Looks like a light leak and bad exposure meter for starters. The light leaks are easy enough to fix, but this camera being a camera that uses auto exposure, the meter needs to be working. I have no idea if these are the issues, I'm not a repair expert, but my guy in Seoul IS an expert. I'll be stopping by to see him today and leave this baby with him knowing full well that I'll get it back as if it had just come off the assembly line.


Olympus 35 RD






Friday, October 23, 2015

My Konica IIIa Back from the Shop... and it Works!


Konica IIIa


I was terribly excited when I first took reception of my vintage Konica IIIa a few months ago. However, as you may or may not have previously read, I discovered, after my first test roll of film, that the range finder was off and therefore, I was unable to focus accurately as attested by the sample photos below. 

One of the great things about living in South Korea, as a photographer, is the abundance of reputable and reasonably-priced camera repair shops. So I wasted no time in taking my Konica IIIa in for some tender loving care.


As you can see, the range finder is off considerably...


Thank goodness for the awesome repair shops here in Seoul!


Below, photos from my test roll AFTER the Konica IIIa came back from the shop. Nice!


As you can see, they did a great job. The camera is now functioning "like new" and the range finder is dead on! Such a relief. Now I can go out and start taking some nice shots with the confidence that the photos will be in focus! Thanks camera repair guy!



Saturday, August 15, 2015

Sony Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8

I haven't shot with it nearly enough, and the only reason I can think of why is that I have been shooting photos for my job in the army more than anything else, and there is NO WAY I am ever taking my Sony A7M2 out of the bag to shoot army stuff. There's far too much dirt and dust and it just wouldn't be smart to expose a camera like this to possible damage in a military shooting environment.

That being said, by far, it's the best digital camera in my inventory. I'm not really that keen on spending close to $3000 for the new A7RII and I don't have a practical need for a 42mp camera at this time. My A7II does everything I need and produces extremely high quality images BUT (here's the rub) I don't have a lot of native lenses for this full-frame e-mount camera. I do have the Sony LA-EA4 adapter, and that's great that I can mount all my a-mount glass, but as far as native e-mount glass, I'm limited. 

I have the 28-70mm kit lens, and it's pretty good, but not spectacular. I also have the outstanding Zeiss Loxia 50mm f/2 but it's manual focus only. So I wanted a high-quality, versatile, auto focus lens that wouldn't break the bank. The Sony Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 fit that bill. 

I bought this one used from my number one camera dealer in Korea for $540. I always buy from this particular supplier whenever possible because when I buy a used item, it is always in like new condition and he always throws in a few free goodies like a filter and lens cloth.

The Sony Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 lens is small, light weight and compact and is fitted with a unique, sort of funny looking lens hood that kind of grows on you after a while. I've only had it for a day and just shot a couple quick images with it. Please note: the sample images below were taken with a Sony A6000.



Please note: the sample images below were taken with a Sony A6000 with Zeiss 35mm f/2.8






Thursday, July 30, 2015

This is What a Light Leak Looks Like - First Roll Minolta SRT-201

UPDATE:

A big thanks for all the advice, suggestions and knowledge from a number of members from the "Film Photographers" Facebook page. After reading the below blog entry several of them identified the problem not as a light leak as I originally thought, but it was more likely a scratch either from the camera or the lab that processed the film. I have used this particular photo lab many times, so I'd have to think the scratches are coming from the camera. I'll give it an inspection and a cleaning and put another roll of film through it. If the scratches still appear, I'll take the camera down to the repair shop.

********

Original post...


One of the main concerns when purchasing a vintage film camera, especially on sites like eBay, is whether or not the camera is in complete working order. Take this Minolta SRT-201 for example. Aesthetically it looks to be in great condition and everything, including the light meter is working, however, when I got my first roll back from the photo lab today I noticed a couple of white lines running left to right across the length of the images. On some images it is more noticeable than others and on one or two, there aren't any white lines at all. The problem? A phenomenon known as a "light leak". 

The edge of the back panel on most film cameras has a thin foam strip that keeps light from getting in. Due in most part to the age of these cameras, the foam strip can deteriorate and not form a complete seal, thus allowing light in which will be seen in photographs, just like you see in the pictures below. The way to correct this is to replace the light seals. Fortunately for me, my shooting buddy and co-host of http://www.HeyDontShoot.com Turner, has replaced light seals on a few of his own vintage film cameras and corrected this problem. So, I'll be taking this particular camera over to his house later and see if we can't correct the problem, stay tuned!


Minolta SRT-201


Notice the white line along the bottom of the images. Some images also have another white line near the top of the image.